Skip to content

Conversation

@razvan
Copy link
Member

@razvan razvan commented Dec 12, 2025

Description

Part of stackabletech/issues#806

Secret class tls has no owner ref anymore:

$ k get secretclass tls -o yaml
apiVersion: secrets.stackable.tech/v1alpha2
kind: SecretClass
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2025-12-15T13:25:18Z"
  generation: 1
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: secrets.stackable.tech_secretclass
    app.kubernetes.io/name: secrets.stackable.tech
    stackable.tech/vendor: Stackable
  name: tls
  resourceVersion: "31202"
  uid: 079bceb0-7014-4ce3-84d5-e5aaaddd501d
spec:
...

🟢 Tests:

Tested with the OLM manifests for the fictional 25.11.1 release from the fix/secret-no-owner-for-cluster-resources branch.

--- PASS: kuttl (164.78s)
    --- PASS: kuttl/harness (0.00s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/listener_openshift-true (35.76s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls-truststore_openshift-true_truststore-target-kind-Secret (11.40s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/kerberos_krb5-1.21.1_openshift-true (63.61s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls-truststore_openshift-true_truststore-target-kind-ConfigMap (10.26s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls_openshift-true_rsa-key-length-3072_custom-secret-names-False (34.49s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/cert-manager-tls_openshift-true (81.70s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls_openshift-true_rsa-key-length-3072_custom-secret-names-True (37.33s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls_openshift-true_rsa-key-length-2048_custom-secret-names-True (17.88s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls_openshift-true_rsa-key-length-2048_custom-secret-names-False (18.19s)
PASS

@razvan razvan marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2025 14:00
@razvan razvan moved this to Development: Waiting for Review in Stackable Engineering Dec 15, 2025
@razvan razvan requested a review from a team December 15, 2025 14:30
@adwk67 adwk67 requested review from adwk67 and removed request for a team December 16, 2025 09:19
@adwk67 adwk67 moved this from Development: Waiting for Review to Development: In Review in Stackable Engineering Dec 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@adwk67 adwk67 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@razvan razvan added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit d90e550 Dec 16, 2025
12 checks passed
@razvan razvan deleted the fix/olm-no-owner-for-cluster-objects branch December 16, 2025 09:50
@adwk67 adwk67 moved this from Development: In Review to Development: Done in Stackable Engineering Dec 16, 2025
@lfrancke lfrancke moved this from Development: Done to Done in Stackable Engineering Dec 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants